VP of Engineering Decision Authority at 50–100 Employees: Real-World CTO Clarity on Operational Span, Execution, and Stage-Specific Boundaries
Most drama pops up when it’s not clear who owns what - especially with the CTO on architecture and with product leadership on what gets built when.
Posted by
Related reading
CTO Architecture Ownership at Early-Stage Startups: Execution Models & Leadership Clarity
At this stage, architecture is about speed and flexibility, not long-term perfection - sometimes you take on technical debt, on purpose, to move faster.
CTO Architecture Ownership at Series A Companies: Real Stage-Specific Accountability
Success: engineering scales without CTO bottlenecks, and technical strategy is clear to investors.
CTO Architecture Ownership at Series B Companies: Leadership & Equity Realities
The CTO role now means balancing technical leadership with business architecture - turning company goals into real technical plans that meet both product needs and investor deadlines.
TL;DR
- At 50–100 employees, the VP of Engineering makes the big calls on technical execution - architecture, tooling, release cycles - while the CEO or CTO keeps the final say over product strategy and the really major tech bets.
- Decision authority falls into three buckets: what the VP fully owns (team structure, hiring, engineering process), what’s shared (roadmap prioritization, build vs. buy), and where they only have veto/input (budget allocation, go-to-market timing).
- The VP gets more authority as the company nails product-market fit, but loses some when the company pivots or cash gets tight.
- Most drama pops up when it’s not clear who owns what - especially with the CTO on architecture and with product leadership on what gets built when.

Decision Authority at 50–100 Employees
At this size, you can’t run engineering just by chatting in Slack. The VP of Engineering handles day-to-day technical execution: hiring, team structure, process, and tooling. But for architecture, major tech investments, or cross-team roadmap calls, they share the wheel with the CTO or CEO. The VP role shifts from managing a handful of people to running a multi-layered org, and if you don’t set clear decision rights, things get stuck.
Boundaries matter. If it’s not clear where the VP’s authority starts and stops, you’ll get duplicate work, missed deadlines, and a lot of “who’s actually in charge here?”
VP of Engineering Decision Boundaries at 50–100 Employees
Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge
Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.
At this stage, the VP of Engineering approves budgets, owns technical hiring, and sets engineering standards. The CTO usually keeps the final say on architecture and long-term tech strategy. The org chart goes from flat to layered, so you need clear decision boundaries between VP, CTO, and Directors.
Core Decision-Making Responsibilities
Direct Authority (No Approval Needed)
- Hiring engineers and managers
- Sprint planning and project priorities (as long as it fits the roadmap)
- Changing team structure (reporting lines, squads)
- Picking engineering tools under $50K/year
- Setting code review and dev workflow standards
- On-call and incident response policies
Shared Authority (Needs CTO/CEO Input)
- Engineering budget over $100K
- Architecture decisions that touch multiple systems
- Build vs. buy for core platform stuff
- Director-level hiring
- Major tech stack changes
- Org restructures that affect other departments
No Authority (CEO/Board Only)
- Total engineering headcount
- Salary bands and equity rules
- Outsourcing/offshoring
- M&A of engineering teams
The VP oversees engineering strategy and daily ops, but now also has a say in where resources go.
Authority and Span of Control by Company Stage
| Company Size | Span of Control | Budget Authority | Hiring Authority | Strategic Input |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50–75 employees | 8–15 direct reports | $50K–$150K | Manager and below | Quarterly planning |
| 75–100 employees | 12–20 direct reports | $150K–$300K | Director and below | Annual roadmap input |
Authority Growth by Stage
- At 50 employees: VP manages 2–3 engineering managers.
- At 100 employees: 3–5 managers plus 1–2 Directors of Engineering.
VP Autonomy Increases With:
- More org layers (post-75 employees)
- Performance improvement plans & terminations
- Cross-functional project commitments
- Technical debt prioritization (up to 20% of sprint capacity)
- Interview process design and hiring targets
Engineering management roles are growing 6% faster than other jobs - specialized decision-makers are in demand.
VP vs. CTO vs. Director: What’s Different?
| Decision Area | Director of Engineering | VP of Engineering | CTO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team scope | 1–2 teams (8–15 people) | Whole department (30–60) | Cross-functional org |
| Technology choices | Implementation details | Framework selection | Architecture vision |
| Budget decisions | Recommends tools | Approves under $100K | Sets total budget |
| Hiring authority | Interviews, recommends | Approves IC to Manager | Approves Director+ |
| Strategic planning | Quarterly execution | Annual dept goals | 2–3 year roadmap |
| External engagement | Recruiting events | Conference speaking | Investor relations |
Decision Flow
- Director spots a need (new service, tool, or headcount)
- VP checks against budget and roadmap
- VP approves (if under threshold) or bumps to CTO
- CTO approves or sends to CEO for board-level stuff
VP vs. CTO: VP runs execution and teams; CTO focuses on long-term tech and innovation.
Leadership Skills by Role
- Director: Team coaching, sprints, mentorship
- VP: Cross-team coordination, resources, stakeholder wrangling
- CTO: Tech evangelism, partnerships, board comms
Rule → Example:
- Rule: Directors escalate blockers. VPs fix them via process or resource changes. CTOs decide if the overall tech approach needs to change.
- Example: “Director flags a hiring bottleneck; VP adjusts the interview process; CTO considers outsourcing.”
Operational Ownership and Cross-Functional Dynamics
At 50–100 employees, the VP of Engineering runs the day-to-day for product, infra, and QA, and is the main engineering contact for non-technical folks. Decisions are less about ad-hoc chats, more about structured processes to keep things moving.
Product Development and Technical Roadmapping
Decision Authority Split
| Decision Type | VP Engineering Owns | Needs Product/CEO Sign-Off |
|---|---|---|
| Sprint priorities (within roadmap) | ✓ | - |
| Architecture choices | ✓ | - |
| Build vs. buy for infra | ✓ | - |
| Feature scope cuts for delivery | ✓ (consults Product) | - |
| Roadmap sequencing (quarterly) | - | ✓ |
| New product lines/pivots | - | ✓ |
| Tools/services >$50K | - | ✓ |
- VP: Owns how things get built
- Product: Owns what gets built and when
Weekly Execution Cycle
- Monday: Sprint progress with eng managers
- Tuesday: Product sync for scope/timeline issues
- Wednesday: Tech debt allocation (15–20% rule)
- Thursday: Code review and architecture checks
- Friday: Stakeholder delivery updates
Rule → Example:
- Rule: VP blocks engineering from constant task switching, but keeps Product in the loop on metrics and delivery.
- Example: “VP says no to last-minute roadmap changes, but shares weekly progress with Product.”
QA, DevOps, and Security: Who Owns What
| Domain | VP Owns Directly | Delegates to Lead | Monitors via Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code review standards | ✓ | - | PR cycle time, defect rate |
| CI/CD pipeline design | - | ✓ (DevOps Lead) | Deploy frequency, rollback % |
| Security response | ✓ (P0/P1) | ✓ (P2/P3) | Time to patch, audit compliance |
| QA coverage policy | ✓ | - | Coverage %, prod incidents |
| Infra scaling decisions | ✓ | - | Uptime, cost per user |
| On-call rotation | ✓ | ✓ (for setup) | Response time, burnout signs |
Quality Control Triggers
- Incident >2 hours: VP joins war room, runs postmortem
- Critical security CVE: VP sets patch deadline
- Test coverage <70%: VP pauses sprints until fixed
- Deploy success <95%: VP and DevOps lead audit pipeline
Rule → Example:
- Rule: VP steps in when severity crosses a set threshold.
- Example: “If downtime hits 2+ hours, VP runs the incident review.”
Stakeholder Partnerships: Communication & Conflict
| Stakeholder | VP Interaction | Content | Format |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEO/Board | Bi-weekly/board mtgs | Delivery, hiring, risk | Metrics + narrative |
| Sales/Customer Success | Weekly | Product, timeline | Slack + 30-min sync |
| Integration Partners | Monthly/project | API stability, changes | Email + docs |
| Enterprise Subscribers | Quarterly | Security, uptime, roadmap | Reports + calls |
Translation Examples
Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge
Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.
- Technical: "Migrating to microservices"
- Shareholder: "Cutting feature launch time by 30%"
- Partner: "API v2 in Q2, v1 deprecated Q4 (6 months’ notice)"
- Subscriber: "SOC 2 audit done, 99.9% uptime"
Teams that rely on just positional authority see 47% lower cross-functional project success than those who build actual influence. VPs win trust by being transparent and delivering, not by barking orders.
Conflict Resolution Protocol
| Conflict Type | VP Action | Resolution Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Eng-Product disputes | VP/Product VP resolve | 48 hours |
| Eng-Sales timeline conflicts | VP gives options (scope cut/date/resource) | ASAP |
| Partner technical issues | VP leads weekly sync until fixed | Ongoing |
| Subscriber escalations | VP responds to P0/P1 in | 24 hours |
Rule → Example:
- Rule: VP shields engineers from constant interruptions but makes sure urgent info gets through.
- Example: “VP fields all stakeholder complaints first, only escalates to teams if it’s truly urgent.”
Frequently Asked Questions
A VP of Engineering at a 50–100 person company has clear technical and organizational authority, measurable performance metrics, and distinct decision boundaries that change as the company grows.
What are the typical responsibilities of a VP of Engineering in a medium-sized company?
Core Responsibilities
- Own the engineering roadmap and execution across 2-4 teams
- Hire and coach engineering managers and senior ICs
- Make key technical standards and architecture calls for the product
- Manage the engineering budget: headcount, tools, infrastructure costs
- Report engineering progress and risks to the CEO and exec team
- Build and refine processes for sprint planning, code review, and deployment
- Connect with Product, Sales, and Customer Success on technical feasibility
Team Management Scope
| Area | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Direct reports | 3-6 engineering managers or tech leads |
| Total engineers | 15-40 individual contributors |
| Team structure | Feature teams, platform team, or hybrid |
| Retention target | Keep annual engineering attrition < 15% |
Cross-Functional Ownership
- Set SLA commitments with Product for feature delivery
- Provide technical input on sales deals needing custom work
- Define incident response protocols and on-call rotations
- Coordinate with Finance on annual engineering budget
Role Shift
Rule → Example
VP of Engineering transitions from regular coding to focusing on system design and people management.
Example: "By this stage, the VP rarely writes code, instead leading teams and setting direction."
How does the role of VP of Engineering evolve in a company with 50-100 employees?
Role Evolution by Employee Count
| Company Size | Primary Focus | Management Layer | Technical Involvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20-50 employees | Architecture + hiring | Flat, 1 layer | Reviews PRs, writes key code |
| 50-75 employees | Process + manager development | 2 layers emerging | Sets standards, some coding |
| 75-100 employees | Org design + planning | 2 full layers | Architecture review only |
Key Transitions at 50-100 Employees
- Shift from managing ICs to managing managers
- Launch formal performance reviews and career ladders
- Set engineering OKRs distinct from product goals
- Create postmortem and root cause processes for incidents
- Define technical debt budgets as a percent of sprint capacity
Decision Authority Shifts
Rule → Example
At 50 employees, major decisions need CEO sign-off.
At 100 employees, the VP decides tech stack, team structure, and tools independently.
Common Failure Modes
- Staying too hands-on with code, not developing managers
- Hiring senior engineers without career progression paths
- Skipping regular 1-on-1s with managers during growth
- Letting technical debt exceed 30% of engineering capacity
What salary range can a VP of Engineering expect in a company with 50-100 employees?
Compensation by Company Stage
| Company Type | Base Salary | Equity Range | Total Cash Comp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed/Series A | $160K-$200K | 0.5%-1.5% | $180K-$230K |
| Series B | $180K-$240K | 0.25%-0.75% | $220K-$280K |
| Series C+ | $220K-$300K | 0.1%-0.4% | $260K-$340K |
| Profitable/Bootstrap | $200K-$280K | 0%-0.5% | $220K-$300K |
Geographic Multipliers
- San Francisco/New York: 1.0x baseline
- Seattle/Boston/LA: 0.85-0.95x
- Austin/Denver/Portland: 0.75-0.85x
- Remote-first: 0.80-0.90x
- International (non-US): 0.60-0.80x
Additional Compensation Elements
- Annual bonus: 15-25% of base
- Four-year equity vesting, one-year cliff
- Health insurance, 401k matching
- $5K-$10K annual professional development budget
Equity Value Rule
Rule → Example
Equity value = Stake × Company Valuation
Example: 0.5% equity in a $50M company = $250K paper value
What decision-making powers does a VP of Engineering typically have in a mid-sized tech company?
Autonomous Decision Authority
- Choose tech stack for new projects
- Approve internal tool purchases under $50K/year
- Set engineering team structure and reporting lines
- Make hiring decisions for engineering roles
- Manage sprint planning and release schedules
- Change engineering processes (CI/CD, code review, testing standards)
- Set remote work and flexible schedule policies for engineering
Requires CEO/Board Approval
- Architecture rewrites over 6 months
- Headcount expansion beyond budget
- Outsourcing/contractor spend >$100K
- Acquiring other companies' engineering teams
- Opening new engineering offices or hubs
- Executive engineering hires (Director+)
Decision Matrix by Impact
| Decision Type | Budget Threshold | Timeline Impact | Approval Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| New developer tool | <$10K/year | None | VP autonomous |
| Infrastructure move | $10K-$50K | 1-3 months | VP + CFO sign-off |
| Platform rebuild | >$50K | 3-6 months | CEO approval required |
| New product line | Any amount | 6+ months | Board approval required |
Collaborative Decision Areas
- Feature prioritization: VP Engineering and VP Product share authority; neither can override the other's roadmap commitments
Common Authority Boundaries
- Can't change company-wide policies (PTO, benefits, office rules)
- Can't set pricing or packaging for products
- Can't commit to delivery dates without Product agreement
- Can't hire outside engineering without approval at 100+ employees
Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge
Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.