Engineering Manager Role at 10โ20 Engineers: Unlocking Scalable Team Execution
Success is measured by team output and retention, not your own commits - impact comes from the team, not your code.
Posted by
Related reading
CTO Architecture Ownership at Early-Stage Startups: Execution Models & Leadership Clarity
At this stage, architecture is about speed and flexibility, not long-term perfection - sometimes you take on technical debt, on purpose, to move faster.
CTO Architecture Ownership at Series A Companies: Real Stage-Specific Accountability
Success: engineering scales without CTO bottlenecks, and technical strategy is clear to investors.
CTO Architecture Ownership at Series B Companies: Leadership & Equity Realities
The CTO role now means balancing technical leadership with business architecture - turning company goals into real technical plans that meet both product needs and investor deadlines.
TL;DR
- Engineering managers with 10โ20 engineers work at the team level, balancing technical know-how with structured people management over 1โ2 sub-teams or product areas.
- Core focus shifts from coding to designing systems: hiring, performance reviews, cross-team coordination, and keeping delivery on track - without writing production code every day.
- Delegation boundaries matter - tech leads handle architecture, while the EM owns team health, planning, and career growth.
- Communication is a deliverable: running 1:1s, translating roadmaps, and writing docs to cut ambiguity.
- Success is measured by team output and retention, not your own commits - impact comes from the team, not your code.

Distinct Responsibilities and Core Competencies for Managing 10โ20 Engineers
At this team size, the EM moves from hands-on work to systems and delegation. You balance some technical involvement with leadership structures that stop bottlenecks as you grow.
Operational Role Differentiation Versus Smaller and Larger Teams
| Team Size | Primary Focus | Management Structure | Technical Involvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5โ9 Engineers | Direct execution | Flat, EM manages all individuals | High: Code reviews, architecture decisions |
| 10โ20 Engineers | Process, delegation | Add tech leads/senior engineers as force multipliers | Medium: Direction, unblocking, standards |
| 20+ Engineers | Org design, manager growth | Multiple teams, leads or managers | Low: Strategy, hiring, alignment |
Key differences at 10โ20 engineers:
- EM canโt maintain 1:1s with everyone and still manage delivery.
- Technical leadership is distributed to seniors/tech leads.
- Project management shifts to coordinating workstreams and cross-functional efforts.
- Manager is measured by team performance, not individual output.
At this stage, the EM isnโt the main technical decision-maker. Instead, you build systems so senior engineers own decisions, but everything stays aligned with business goals.
Key Leadership Skills for Scaling Team Performance
Critical leadership competencies:
- Delegation with accountability: Give project ownership to seniors, but still own outcomes.
- Conflict resolution: Mediate technical debates without dictating answers.
- Stakeholder communication: Explain engineering constraints to product and business folks.
- Performance management: Run reviews and career plans for 10โ20 people.
- Hiring: Own interview standards and final hiring calls.
Common failure modes:
- Jumping into every technical crisis (โhero syndromeโ)
- Dodging tough performance talks until itโs too late
- Delegating tasks but not authority or context
- Focusing only on delivery, not improvement
Rule โ Example:
Rule: Always assign project ownership with clear accountability.
Example: โSarah owns the new payments API; she reports weekly status and flags blockers.โ
Technical Expertise Requirements and Execution Leverage
| Activity | Direct Ownership | Delegated to Senior Engineer | Oversight Only |
|---|---|---|---|
| System architecture decisions | โ | โ | |
| Code reviews (critical paths) | โ | โ | |
| Incident response | โ | โ | |
| Tech evaluation/adoption | โ | โ | |
| Standards and tooling | โ | โ | |
| Technical debt prioritization | โ |
The EM keeps technical credibility through architecture reviews and tech decisions, not daily coding. You need enough system design knowledge to spot trade-offs and challenge assumptions.
Execution leverage strategies:
- Set up tech leads for big subsystems or products
- Define clear ownership for teams on different business goals
- Build review processes that surface risk (without needing your sign-off every time)
- Document standards so teams can make decisions on their own
Rule โ Example:
Rule: Engineering managers review architectural proposals, not every pull request.
Example: โReviewed the migration plan for the new database, but let the team handle implementation PRs.โ
Stage-Specific Project Management Approaches
Project coordination at 10โ20 engineers:
- Multi-track delivery: Run 3โ5 parallel projects with different timelines.
- Cross-functional orchestration: Coordinate with product, design, and business.
- Capacity planning: Allocate resources by priority, including on-call and technical debt.
- Risk identification: Spot delivery risks early through check-ins with leads.
Project management structure:
- Weekly sync with senior engineers/tech leads on status and blockers
- Bi-weekly stakeholder updates (timelines, scope changes)
- Monthly team velocity/process review
- Quarterly planning to align with business goals
Managers here track team health and predictability, not every single task. Step in when projects are at risk, but donโt become a bottleneck.
Applying for the Engineering Manager Role: Communication and Documentation
Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge
Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.
A strong application needs written material that shows both technical credibility and leadership. Your cover letter and resume must prove youโve managed 10โ20 engineers and delivered real results.
Engineering Manager Cover Letter Essentials
| Component | Purpose | Content Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Header | Identify sender/recipient | Full name, phone, email, date, hiring manager name/title |
| Greeting | Professional intro | โDear [Hiring Manager Name]โ or โDear Engineering Leadership Teamโ |
| Introduction | Hook reader | State target role, team size, years managing |
| Body | Prove capability | Quantified achievements, delivery metrics, retention rates |
| Closing | Call to action | Request interview, restate fit, give availability |
Rule โ Example:
Rule: State exact team size managed in the introduction.
Example: โI currently lead a team of 16 engineers building distributed SaaS platforms.โ
The body should include 2โ3 examples showing people management and delivery at this scale.
Crafting an Effective Professional Cover Letter
Paragraph Structure
- Paragraph 1: State the EM role and your current team size (10โ20 engineers).
- Paragraph 2: Highlight a major delivery achievement (timeline, budget, team size, business impact).
- Paragraph 3: Describe people management: hiring, 1:1s, reviews, career growth.
- Paragraph 4: Explain technical coordination: roadmap planning, cross-functional work, process improvements.
Each paragraph must include concrete metrics - engineers hired, projects shipped, systems scaled, retention rates.
Tailoring Your Resume Template to the Role
| Resume Section | Standard Content | Modified for EM Role |
|---|---|---|
| Summary | General leadership | โManaged 15-engineer team, 3 products, $2M budget, 95% retentionโ |
| Experience Bullets | Individual contributions | Team outcomes, hiring numbers, delivery cadence, process changes |
| Technical Skills | Programming languages | Add: Performance management, roadmap planning, stakeholder comms |
| Key Achievements | Personal code | Team velocity, quality metrics, headcount growth |
Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge
Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.
List frameworks used for 1:1s, reviews, and sprint planning at this scale. Show your shift from IC to managing larger teams. Specify team sizes for each role.
Remove detailed code implementation. Focus on architecture decisions, technology choices, and team-building that enabled delivery at the 10โ20 engineer level.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the core responsibilities of an engineering manager in a team of 10โ20 engineers?
Primary Responsibilities
- Design project workflows and sprint structures
- Run 1:1s with 8โ12 direct reports (biweekly)
- Allocate resources across 2โ4 projects
- Track team KPIs: velocity, incidents, deployments
- Manage hiring and onboarding
- Resolve technical blockers, cross-team dependencies
- Deliver performance reviews and promotion calibration
Daily Execution
- Run daily stand-ups (15 min max)
- Review PRs for architecture alignment
- Triage product/ops requests
- Escalate resource conflicts as needed
Budget and Planning
| Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Budget | Controls team-level spend on tools/services/contractors |
| Planning | Converts quarterly OKRs into sprint execution plans |
Time Allocation
| Task Type | % of Time Spent |
|---|---|
| People management | 60โ70% |
| Technical oversight | 30โ40% |
Engineering managers focus less on coding, more on allocation and conflict management.
How does the role of an engineering manager evolve as the team grows from 10 to 20 members?
| Team Size | Management Structure | Time Allocation | Key Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 engineers | Single manager, flat team | 50% people / 50% technical | Manager is hands-on with technical reviews |
| 15 engineers | Manager + 1โ2 tech leads | 65% people / 35% technical | Manager starts delegating code reviews and decisions |
| 20 engineers | Manager + 2โ3 tech leads or split into 2 teams | 75% people / 25% technical | Team leads or sub-teams own domains; manager steps back from day-to-day tech work |
Process Changes at 15+ Engineers
- Assign tech leads for domain-specific decisions
- Set up formal on-call rotation and escalation
- Start team-level architecture review boards
- Run stand-ups by sub-team or domain
Communication Shift
| Team Size | Manager's Technical Involvement | Primary Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 10 engineers | Direct code review, technical context | Hands-on technical and people management |
| 20 engineers | Relies on tech leads for updates | Cross-team coordination, setting standards |
Manager's Role Shift
- Rule โ Example: Manager moves from direct code review to setting standards
- Example: "I used to review every pull request; now I audit outcomes and set guidelines."
What is the ideal ratio of engineers to managers for maintaining effective oversight and support?
| Ratio | Management Capacity | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| 5:1 | Intensive mentoring | Early-stage, mostly junior teams |
| 7โ8:1 | Balanced oversight | Mixed-seniority, growing teams |
| 10โ12:1 | Lean at scale | Senior teams, mature processes |
| 15+:1 | Overextended | Needs sub-leads or team split |
Recommended Structures for 10โ20 Engineers
- 10โ12: Single manager, no leads
- 13โ16: One manager, 2 tech leads
- 17โ20: Two teams, each with a manager
Direct Reports Rule
- Rule โ Example: Avoid more than 12 direct reports per manager
- Example: "With 13+ reports, 1-on-1s become shallow; feedback gets generic."
| Team Seniority | Oversight Needed |
|---|---|
| Mostly seniors | Less oversight |
| Mostly juniors | More oversight |
What strategies should engineering managers employ to handle the increased complexity of larger teams?
Delegation Framework
- Assign tech leads for backend, frontend, infra, etc.
- Give clear decision rights for architecture below a set threshold
- Define code ownership by service/module
- Let on-call engineers handle incidents, escalate as needed
Process Standardization
- Document coding standards and architecture decisions (ADRs)
- Use automated code review checklists
- Provide templates for specs and design docs
- Set up escalation rules for cross-team work
Communication Structure
| Audience | Frequency | Format | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full team | Weekly | 30-min sync | Roadmap, blockers, news |
| Sub-teams | Daily | 15-min stand-up | Status, dependencies |
| Tech leads | 2x/week | 1-hour session | Technical alignment |
| Individuals | Biweekly | 1-on-1 | Growth, feedback |
Metrics and Visibility
- Track sub-team velocity
- Monitor incident rates by service
- Measure deployment frequency
- Use dashboards for updates
Conflict Resolution Playbook
Set escalation paths for disagreements
Use architecture review boards for tough calls
Define SLAs for cross-team requests
Rule โ Example: At 15+ engineers, managers must delegate and watch for burnout
- Example: "After 15 people, I rely on tech leads and set clear escalation paths to avoid overload."
Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge
Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.