Back to Blog

Tech Lead Role at 10–20 Engineers: Operational Clarity for Scale

The need for a tech lead usually pops up when one team splits, or when technical complexity demands dedicated architectural oversight - something senior engineers can’t quite cover while shipping features.

Posted by

TL;DR

  • Tech leads at 10–20 engineers own technical execution across 2–4 cross-functional teams, usually keeping 30–50% of their time for hands-on coding.
  • The role sits between individual contributor and manager - think architecture decisions, code quality gates, and unblocking engineers, but without actual personnel authority.
  • Main failure mode? Trying to code full-time while also being on the hook for technical delivery - leads to bottlenecks and slow decisions.
  • Good tech leads put clear decision frameworks in place, delegate technical ownership to senior engineers, and keep communication open with product and engineering management.
  • The need for a tech lead usually pops up when one team splits, or when technical complexity demands dedicated architectural oversight - something senior engineers can’t quite cover while shipping features.

A tech lead standing and interacting with a group of engineers working together around a table in an office.

Defining the Tech Lead Role at 10–20 Engineer Scale

At 10–20 engineers, the tech lead is both a hands-on contributor and technical decision-maker, bridging individual work with team-wide architecture. The boundaries are clear: not quite architect, not quite manager. Sometimes it’s a formal title; sometimes it just happens because someone steps up.

Core Responsibilities and Accountability

Primary Technical Ownership

  • Define and maintain system architecture for the team or product area
  • Make final calls on tech choices, patterns, and trade-offs
  • Ensure code quality through reviews, pairing, and standards
  • Own non-functional requirements: performance, security, scalability
  • Build observability into systems and respond to prod incidents

Team Execution

  • Coordinate technical work across 5–10 engineers
  • Break down big features into tasks
  • Remove blockers
  • Validate testing approaches and coverage
  • Set branching strategies and deployment processes

Communication Duties

  • Represent technical constraints and timelines to product
  • Explain architecture decisions to engineers and non-technical folks
  • Escalate risks before they become project blockers

The tech lead role is about the "how" of projects. At this size, a tech lead usually spends 50–70% of their time coding, with the rest on architecture and coordination.

Differences from Architect and Engineering Manager

RolePrimary FocusScopePeople Responsibility
Tech LeadTechnical execution + team coordinationSingle team (5–10 people)Mentoring, technical guidance only
ArchitectSystem design + cross-team patternsMultiple teams/platformNone - advisory
Engineering ManagerPeople development + project deliveryOne or more teamsDirect reports, reviews, career growth

Key Distinctions

  • Tech leads stay in the code: reviewing PRs, on-call, writing production code.
  • Architects operate at a higher level: design systems across teams, don’t own delivery timelines, don’t manage people.
  • Engineering managers focus on "who" and "when": career growth, conflict resolution, resource allocation.

Hybrid Configurations

  • Sometimes tech lead and engineering manager are combined. This often means less time for coding and more for people management. Splitting the roles lets tech leads keep technical depth, while managers handle growth and team dynamics.

Formal vs. Informal Tech Lead Structures

Formal Tech Lead Role

Informal Tech Lead Structure

Decision Factors

FactorFormal StructureInformal Structure
Team stabilityStable for 6+ monthsFrequent restructuring
Technical complexityMultiple systems, deep expertiseSingle product, shared knowledge
Growth trajectoryScaling past 20 engineersStaying about the same size
Comp equityRecognize leadershipAll engineers similar levels

Most companies this size start with informal tech leads and formalize as they approach 20+ engineers. The Tech Lead Handbook points out: specifics vary, but the core responsibilities are pretty consistent.

Key Leadership and Execution Patterns

β˜•Get Codeinated

Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge

Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.

Tech leads at this scale juggle hands-on work with systematic guidance around code quality, architecture, and team development. They set up repeatable decision-making, review, and knowledge-sharing patterns to keep 10–20 engineers aligned - without slowing things down.

Technical Direction and Architectural Decisions

Primary Responsibilities

  • Define system architecture for new features/services
  • Pick design patterns, frameworks, and tools
  • Set technical standards
  • Identify and prioritize technical debt
  • Assess technical risks before big builds
  • Act as technical contact for product managers and stakeholders

Decision-Making Pattern

Decision TypeTech Lead OwnsRequires Team InputEscalates To
Design patterns for featuresYesOptionalEngineering Manager (if big impact)
Tech stack additionsYesRequiredCTO/VP Eng (if org-wide impact)
System architecture linesYesRequiredSenior engineers (for validation)
Tech debt prioritizationProposesRequiredProduct owners (for timeline trade-offs)

Common Failure Modes

  • Making architecture decisions solo, without team input
  • Picking frameworks based on personal taste, not project needs
  • Not documenting decisions
  • Ignoring tech debt until it blocks progress

Driving Code Quality, Reviews, and Best Practices

Code Review Ownership

  • Reviews all high-risk PRs directly
  • Sets coding standards
  • Creates review checklists for common issues
  • Watches code review velocity to avoid bottlenecks
  • Spots patterns in feedback that call for new standards

Quality Enforcement Mechanisms

MechanismImplementationFrequency
Automated testingCI/CD gates block merges below coverage thresholdPer commit
Architecture reviewTeam reviews design docs before codingWeekly or per feature
Code review SLATech lead escalates reviews stuck >24 hoursDaily
Tech debt trackingLabeled tickets, quarterly reduction targetsQuarterly

Tech leads don’t review every PR. They focus on critical changes and coach seniors to handle routine reviews using the standards.

Best Practice Distribution

  • Documents patterns in a wiki or code samples
  • Runs knowledge-sharing sessions
  • Pairs with devs on tricky implementations
  • Updates standards based on recurring feedback

Mentoring, Feedback, and Continuous Learning

β˜•Get Codeinated

Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge

Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.

Mentoring Structure by Experience Level

Engineer LevelMentoring FocusDelivery MethodTech Lead Time Investment
Junior devsCode quality, debugging, toolsPair programming, detailed PRs3–4 hrs/week
Mid-levelDesign, architecture, communicationDesign reviews, 1:1s2–3 hrs/week
SeniorLeadership, architectural decisions, commsStrategic talks, delegate sub-teams1–2 hrs/week

Feedback Delivery Pattern

  • Gives technical feedback in code reviews right away
  • Holds 1:1s for career-focused guidance
  • Distinguishes blocking issues (must fix) from learning opportunities (explain, don’t require)
  • Tracks feedback patterns to spot team skill gaps

Continuous Learning Initiatives

  • Sets aside time for devs to try new tools/languages
  • Organizes internal tech talks
  • Finds external training for blockers
  • Encourages joining tech communities, conferences

Team Cohesion Through Technical Practice

  • Sets up workflows balancing autonomy and consistency
  • Resolves technical disagreements using data and constraints
  • Ensures redundancy in critical system knowledge
  • Maintains effective communication between devs and other teams

Frequently Asked Questions

Tech leads with 10–20 engineers get a specific set of questions around role boundaries, coordination, and growth responsibilities - different from smaller teams or full-on management.

What are the primary responsibilities of a Tech Lead in a mid-sized engineering team?

Core Responsibilities by Category:

CategorySpecific Duties
Technical DirectionDefines architecture, reviews critical PRs, sets code standards, makes build vs. buy calls
Project CoordinationBreaks features into tasks, assigns work, unblocks engineers, manages dependencies
Team InterfaceCommunicates status, translates business needs to technical specs, represents team in planning
Code ContributionWrites code for complex features (20–40% of time), maintains critical systems, shows implementation patterns
Quality OversightMonitors system health, enforces testing, leads incident response, reviews deployment processes

Time Allocation at 10–20 Engineers:

  • 30–40% coordination and planning
  • 20–30% code reviews and architecture
  • 20–30% hands-on coding
  • 10–20% meetings/stakeholder comms

Rule β†’ Example:
Rule: Delegate code review to senior engineers and distribute decision-making as the team grows.
Example: Tech lead reviews critical PRs; senior engineers handle routine reviews.

How does a Tech Lead differ from an Engineering Manager in terms of day-to-day responsibilities?

Role Boundary Comparison:

ResponsibilityTech LeadEngineering Manager
Code ReviewReviews key architecture PRs dailyRarely reviews code
1-on-1sInformal tech mentoringFormal biweekly career meetings
Performance ReviewsGives technical feedbackRuns review process, owns ratings
HiringRuns technical screensManages hiring pipeline, owns headcount
Salary/PromotionNo authorityFinal decision maker
ArchitectureMakes final technical callsProvides context, not technical decisions
Sprint PlanningLeads technical breakdownEnsures team can deliver commitments
Incident ResponseJoins on-call rotationManages comms and postmortems

Decision Authority:

  • Rule β†’ The Tech Lead decides what and how to build; the Engineering Manager decides who builds it and manages their careers.
    • Example: Tech Lead picks database; EM handles promotions.

Common Failure Mode:

  • Rule β†’ Tech Leads should not handle performance or salary talks.
    • Example: Tech Lead discussing raises causes confusion - this is the EM’s job.

In what ways does the Tech Lead role evolve when overseeing a team of 10–20 engineers?

Role Evolution by Team Size:

Team SizeTech Lead FocusPrimary Activities
3–5 EngineersDirect technical executionWrites 60–70% of key code, reviews all PRs, pairs often
6–9 EngineersTechnical coordinationWrites 40–50% of code, delegates reviews, sets team patterns
10–20 EngineersSystems thinking & delegationWrites 20–30% of code, focuses on architecture, mentors seniors

Specific Changes at 10–20 Engineers:

  • Samples PRs instead of reviewing all
  • Sets decision criteria, doesn’t make every call
  • Plans capacity with sub-leads, not direct assignments
  • Writes infra/tools, not features
  • Coaches others to solve blockers

New Capabilities Required:

  • Rule β†’ Tech Lead must delegate technical decisions to senior engineers to avoid being a bottleneck.
    • Example: Senior devs own feature design, Tech Lead reviews approach.

What are the expectations for a Tech Lead in coordinating project tasks among team members?

Project Coordination Mechanics:

  • Breaks epics into 2–3 day tasks
  • Maps work to engineer skills and bandwidth
  • Flags dependencies early
  • Runs standup focused on blockers
  • Reassigns tasks if estimates slip

Task Assignment Framework:

Engineer LevelTask ComplexityTech Lead Involvement
Junior (0–2 yrs)Well-defined tickets, clear criteriaDaily check-ins, detailed reviews
Mid (2–4 yrs)Feature work, some design neededWeekly syncs, architecture guidance
Senior (4+ yrs)Ambiguous projects, research-heavyMinimal oversight, outcome check-ins

Coordination Cadence:

  • Daily: Monitors PRs, CI/CD health
  • Weekly: Checks sprint progress, shifts priorities
  • Biweekly: Plans next sprint with product
  • Monthly: Reviews team velocity, process tweaks

Workload Monitoring:

  • Rule β†’ Track completion rates and utilization to spot uneven workload.
    • Example: If one engineer’s tasks pile up, rebalance assignments.

Skill vs. Deadline Balance:

  • Rule β†’ Balance skill growth opportunities with delivery pressure.
    • Example: Assign stretch tasks, but not at the cost of missing deadlines.
β˜•Get Codeinated

Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge

Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.