Tech Lead Role at 10β20 Engineers: Operational Clarity for Scale
The need for a tech lead usually pops up when one team splits, or when technical complexity demands dedicated architectural oversight - something senior engineers canβt quite cover while shipping features.
Posted by
Related reading
CTO Architecture Ownership at Early-Stage Startups: Execution Models & Leadership Clarity
At this stage, architecture is about speed and flexibility, not long-term perfection - sometimes you take on technical debt, on purpose, to move faster.
CTO Architecture Ownership at Series A Companies: Real Stage-Specific Accountability
Success: engineering scales without CTO bottlenecks, and technical strategy is clear to investors.
CTO Architecture Ownership at Series B Companies: Leadership & Equity Realities
The CTO role now means balancing technical leadership with business architecture - turning company goals into real technical plans that meet both product needs and investor deadlines.
TL;DR
- Tech leads at 10β20 engineers own technical execution across 2β4 cross-functional teams, usually keeping 30β50% of their time for hands-on coding.
- The role sits between individual contributor and manager - think architecture decisions, code quality gates, and unblocking engineers, but without actual personnel authority.
- Main failure mode? Trying to code full-time while also being on the hook for technical delivery - leads to bottlenecks and slow decisions.
- Good tech leads put clear decision frameworks in place, delegate technical ownership to senior engineers, and keep communication open with product and engineering management.
- The need for a tech lead usually pops up when one team splits, or when technical complexity demands dedicated architectural oversight - something senior engineers canβt quite cover while shipping features.

Defining the Tech Lead Role at 10β20 Engineer Scale
At 10β20 engineers, the tech lead is both a hands-on contributor and technical decision-maker, bridging individual work with team-wide architecture. The boundaries are clear: not quite architect, not quite manager. Sometimes itβs a formal title; sometimes it just happens because someone steps up.
Core Responsibilities and Accountability
Primary Technical Ownership
- Define and maintain system architecture for the team or product area
- Make final calls on tech choices, patterns, and trade-offs
- Ensure code quality through reviews, pairing, and standards
- Own non-functional requirements: performance, security, scalability
- Build observability into systems and respond to prod incidents
Team Execution
- Coordinate technical work across 5β10 engineers
- Break down big features into tasks
- Remove blockers
- Validate testing approaches and coverage
- Set branching strategies and deployment processes
Communication Duties
- Represent technical constraints and timelines to product
- Explain architecture decisions to engineers and non-technical folks
- Escalate risks before they become project blockers
The tech lead role is about the "how" of projects. At this size, a tech lead usually spends 50β70% of their time coding, with the rest on architecture and coordination.
Differences from Architect and Engineering Manager
| Role | Primary Focus | Scope | People Responsibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tech Lead | Technical execution + team coordination | Single team (5β10 people) | Mentoring, technical guidance only |
| Architect | System design + cross-team patterns | Multiple teams/platform | None - advisory |
| Engineering Manager | People development + project delivery | One or more teams | Direct reports, reviews, career growth |
Key Distinctions
- Tech leads stay in the code: reviewing PRs, on-call, writing production code.
- Architects operate at a higher level: design systems across teams, donβt own delivery timelines, donβt manage people.
- Engineering managers focus on "who" and "when": career growth, conflict resolution, resource allocation.
Hybrid Configurations
- Sometimes tech lead and engineering manager are combined. This often means less time for coding and more for people management. Splitting the roles lets tech leads keep technical depth, while managers handle growth and team dynamics.
Formal vs. Informal Tech Lead Structures
Formal Tech Lead Role
- Official title in org charts and comp bands
- Explicit authority for technical decisions
- Accountable for system reliability and delivery quality
- Distinct career path from management
Informal Tech Lead Structure
- Senior engineers take leadership responsibilities without a title
- Rotates based on project or expertise
- Authority from technical credibility, not position
- Common in flat or early-stage companies
Decision Factors
| Factor | Formal Structure | Informal Structure |
|---|---|---|
| Team stability | Stable for 6+ months | Frequent restructuring |
| Technical complexity | Multiple systems, deep expertise | Single product, shared knowledge |
| Growth trajectory | Scaling past 20 engineers | Staying about the same size |
| Comp equity | Recognize leadership | All engineers similar levels |
Most companies this size start with informal tech leads and formalize as they approach 20+ engineers. The Tech Lead Handbook points out: specifics vary, but the core responsibilities are pretty consistent.
Key Leadership and Execution Patterns
Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge
Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.
Tech leads at this scale juggle hands-on work with systematic guidance around code quality, architecture, and team development. They set up repeatable decision-making, review, and knowledge-sharing patterns to keep 10β20 engineers aligned - without slowing things down.
Technical Direction and Architectural Decisions
Primary Responsibilities
- Define system architecture for new features/services
- Pick design patterns, frameworks, and tools
- Set technical standards
- Identify and prioritize technical debt
- Assess technical risks before big builds
- Act as technical contact for product managers and stakeholders
Decision-Making Pattern
| Decision Type | Tech Lead Owns | Requires Team Input | Escalates To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design patterns for features | Yes | Optional | Engineering Manager (if big impact) |
| Tech stack additions | Yes | Required | CTO/VP Eng (if org-wide impact) |
| System architecture lines | Yes | Required | Senior engineers (for validation) |
| Tech debt prioritization | Proposes | Required | Product owners (for timeline trade-offs) |
Common Failure Modes
- Making architecture decisions solo, without team input
- Picking frameworks based on personal taste, not project needs
- Not documenting decisions
- Ignoring tech debt until it blocks progress
Driving Code Quality, Reviews, and Best Practices
Code Review Ownership
- Reviews all high-risk PRs directly
- Sets coding standards
- Creates review checklists for common issues
- Watches code review velocity to avoid bottlenecks
- Spots patterns in feedback that call for new standards
Quality Enforcement Mechanisms
| Mechanism | Implementation | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Automated testing | CI/CD gates block merges below coverage threshold | Per commit |
| Architecture review | Team reviews design docs before coding | Weekly or per feature |
| Code review SLA | Tech lead escalates reviews stuck >24 hours | Daily |
| Tech debt tracking | Labeled tickets, quarterly reduction targets | Quarterly |
Tech leads donβt review every PR. They focus on critical changes and coach seniors to handle routine reviews using the standards.
Best Practice Distribution
- Documents patterns in a wiki or code samples
- Runs knowledge-sharing sessions
- Pairs with devs on tricky implementations
- Updates standards based on recurring feedback
Mentoring, Feedback, and Continuous Learning
Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge
Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.
Mentoring Structure by Experience Level
| Engineer Level | Mentoring Focus | Delivery Method | Tech Lead Time Investment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Junior devs | Code quality, debugging, tools | Pair programming, detailed PRs | 3β4 hrs/week |
| Mid-level | Design, architecture, communication | Design reviews, 1:1s | 2β3 hrs/week |
| Senior | Leadership, architectural decisions, comms | Strategic talks, delegate sub-teams | 1β2 hrs/week |
Feedback Delivery Pattern
- Gives technical feedback in code reviews right away
- Holds 1:1s for career-focused guidance
- Distinguishes blocking issues (must fix) from learning opportunities (explain, donβt require)
- Tracks feedback patterns to spot team skill gaps
Continuous Learning Initiatives
- Sets aside time for devs to try new tools/languages
- Organizes internal tech talks
- Finds external training for blockers
- Encourages joining tech communities, conferences
Team Cohesion Through Technical Practice
- Sets up workflows balancing autonomy and consistency
- Resolves technical disagreements using data and constraints
- Ensures redundancy in critical system knowledge
- Maintains effective communication between devs and other teams
Frequently Asked Questions
Tech leads with 10β20 engineers get a specific set of questions around role boundaries, coordination, and growth responsibilities - different from smaller teams or full-on management.
What are the primary responsibilities of a Tech Lead in a mid-sized engineering team?
Core Responsibilities by Category:
| Category | Specific Duties |
|---|---|
| Technical Direction | Defines architecture, reviews critical PRs, sets code standards, makes build vs. buy calls |
| Project Coordination | Breaks features into tasks, assigns work, unblocks engineers, manages dependencies |
| Team Interface | Communicates status, translates business needs to technical specs, represents team in planning |
| Code Contribution | Writes code for complex features (20β40% of time), maintains critical systems, shows implementation patterns |
| Quality Oversight | Monitors system health, enforces testing, leads incident response, reviews deployment processes |
Time Allocation at 10β20 Engineers:
- 30β40% coordination and planning
- 20β30% code reviews and architecture
- 20β30% hands-on coding
- 10β20% meetings/stakeholder comms
Rule β Example:
Rule: Delegate code review to senior engineers and distribute decision-making as the team grows.
Example: Tech lead reviews critical PRs; senior engineers handle routine reviews.
How does a Tech Lead differ from an Engineering Manager in terms of day-to-day responsibilities?
Role Boundary Comparison:
| Responsibility | Tech Lead | Engineering Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | Reviews key architecture PRs daily | Rarely reviews code |
| 1-on-1s | Informal tech mentoring | Formal biweekly career meetings |
| Performance Reviews | Gives technical feedback | Runs review process, owns ratings |
| Hiring | Runs technical screens | Manages hiring pipeline, owns headcount |
| Salary/Promotion | No authority | Final decision maker |
| Architecture | Makes final technical calls | Provides context, not technical decisions |
| Sprint Planning | Leads technical breakdown | Ensures team can deliver commitments |
| Incident Response | Joins on-call rotation | Manages comms and postmortems |
Decision Authority:
- Rule β The Tech Lead decides what and how to build; the Engineering Manager decides who builds it and manages their careers.
- Example: Tech Lead picks database; EM handles promotions.
Common Failure Mode:
- Rule β Tech Leads should not handle performance or salary talks.
- Example: Tech Lead discussing raises causes confusion - this is the EMβs job.
In what ways does the Tech Lead role evolve when overseeing a team of 10β20 engineers?
Role Evolution by Team Size:
| Team Size | Tech Lead Focus | Primary Activities |
|---|---|---|
| 3β5 Engineers | Direct technical execution | Writes 60β70% of key code, reviews all PRs, pairs often |
| 6β9 Engineers | Technical coordination | Writes 40β50% of code, delegates reviews, sets team patterns |
| 10β20 Engineers | Systems thinking & delegation | Writes 20β30% of code, focuses on architecture, mentors seniors |
Specific Changes at 10β20 Engineers:
- Samples PRs instead of reviewing all
- Sets decision criteria, doesnβt make every call
- Plans capacity with sub-leads, not direct assignments
- Writes infra/tools, not features
- Coaches others to solve blockers
New Capabilities Required:
- Rule β Tech Lead must delegate technical decisions to senior engineers to avoid being a bottleneck.
- Example: Senior devs own feature design, Tech Lead reviews approach.
What are the expectations for a Tech Lead in coordinating project tasks among team members?
Project Coordination Mechanics:
- Breaks epics into 2β3 day tasks
- Maps work to engineer skills and bandwidth
- Flags dependencies early
- Runs standup focused on blockers
- Reassigns tasks if estimates slip
Task Assignment Framework:
| Engineer Level | Task Complexity | Tech Lead Involvement |
|---|---|---|
| Junior (0β2 yrs) | Well-defined tickets, clear criteria | Daily check-ins, detailed reviews |
| Mid (2β4 yrs) | Feature work, some design needed | Weekly syncs, architecture guidance |
| Senior (4+ yrs) | Ambiguous projects, research-heavy | Minimal oversight, outcome check-ins |
Coordination Cadence:
- Daily: Monitors PRs, CI/CD health
- Weekly: Checks sprint progress, shifts priorities
- Biweekly: Plans next sprint with product
- Monthly: Reviews team velocity, process tweaks
Workload Monitoring:
- Rule β Track completion rates and utilization to spot uneven workload.
- Example: If one engineerβs tasks pile up, rebalance assignments.
Skill vs. Deadline Balance:
- Rule β Balance skill growth opportunities with delivery pressure.
- Example: Assign stretch tasks, but not at the cost of missing deadlines.
Wake Up Your Tech Knowledge
Join 40,000 others and get Codeinated in 5 minutes. The free weekly email that wakes up your tech knowledge. Five minutes. Every week. No drowsiness. Five minutes. No drowsiness.